What is the issue with letting doctors prescribe one of the safest and least toxic drugs to people? Dr Joseph Varon, the “Covid Hunter” is one of the leading covid experts. He’s traveled the world and done hundreds of interviews for various media outlets about covid and he says every single one has edited out the part where he uses Ivermectin. They seek his advice, then they edit parts out before they air it. Why?
I submit that it is because virtually all mainstream media outlets are funded by big Pharma (this is hardly a secret at this point), and Ivermectin stands in their way of milking even more money out of everyone, so Pfizer et al use their media stooges to demonize the drug, and to silence doctors who do speak about it.
Whether the drug is effective, it is proven to be safe. And plenty of doctors do think it’s effective. So why are doctors pressured not to prescribe or even mention it at all? Why has it become this big issue? It couldn’t be more top-down contrived.
The only way it could be unsafe if is people are so certain it’s a wonder drug (in part thanks to the mad scramble in effect to demonize and censor all discussion of it) that they resort to using the horse medicine because the human pills have been essentially banned. They ban the safe stuff for humans, then endanger and ridicule people by forcing their hand and making them use the potentially dangerous stuff as a last resort. It’s quite evil.
“Even as it falls apart.” They seem determined not to ever let it just fall apart of its own accord. They want to stop it on its tracks before it falls apart. Why? Are they afraid it won’t actually fall apart?
Should the CDC or some other government agency not conduct its own clinical trials given that countries like Bolivia are including it in home kits? If other countries are saying it works, shouldn’t some medical organization do the clinical trials to see? Isn’t this the CDC’s job to investigate stuff like this?
But no, when the train first started chugging, YouTube was removing videos that talked about Ivermectin as a treatment. They don’t anymore, as the train is in full motion and they simply can’t keep a lid on it. But their reason then was that the CDC has said there is no evidence that it’s effective. …not that they actually did trials and determined its no good. They just never did the trials. The Center for Disease Control just didn’t care enough to check out this drug that countries are saying they use.
@S.Cheung says it is the proponents of Ivermectin who should conduct clinical trials. But in the US and other places how is some doctor or another here or there supposed to organize that while being demonized at every turn? I imagine it’s medical organizations who generally do this kind of thing. And if they want their funding from the Gates Foundation which they rely on to exist then there’s no way they’ll be able to do these trials without sinking themselves. Their funders simply won’t allow it.
I read about one study that concluded the drug was failure because it didn’t help people who were already intubated, suffering from lingering effects of the disease after the virus had already left their system. Big surprise that didn’t help when other countries preemptively issue it in home kits for early administration. It needs to be taken early on to inhibit the viral replication.